Sunday, December 9, 2007

Old Brain, New Tricks

New research on the blind is revealing the brain's ability to adapt -- and may lead to new therapies for everything from strokes to chronic pain

Courtesy By Cara FeinbergSource: Boston Globe

Esref Armagan is a 52-year-old Turkish painter who has been blind in both eyes since the day he was born. He has never seen a coffee cup, a toothbrush, an elephant, or a tree-lined street, but he can draw them each, from any perspective, with or without shadows depending on the time of day. His portrait of President Clinton, which he painted from an embossed photograph, looks, well, like Clinton -- complete with grey hair and bulbous nose -- and though Armagan has never had an art lesson, the streets he paints stretch into the distance as converging parallel lines.
For years, Armagan has been a phenomenon in the art world, displaying his work in museums around the globe. But it was not until two summers ago, when he traveled to Boston, that scientists were able to study precisely how he generates such images. Their hope was that he might teach them something about neural ''plasticity"--the brain's ability to reorganize its functions based on new information and experiences. If Armagan had never seen with his eyes, how had his brain adapted to give him visual representations of the world, and more importantly, what could it reveal about brain adaptation in general?
In July of 2004, at the Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston, Armagan agreed to have his brain imaged in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine while he drew with a pencil on a sheet of paper. He explored a set of objects by touch -- a coffee cup, a toy elephant, a toothbrush -- and then was told to imagine them and draw them all from memory. Each time, his drawings hit the mark.
''What we saw in the scan was quite amazing," says Dr. Alvaro Pascual-Leone, an associate professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and director of the center. He and two colleagues in Beth Israel Deaconess's neurology department, Amir Amedi, PhD, and Dr. Lotfi Merabet, conducted a series of scans, each time challenging Armagan with more complex tasks. ''Esref's visual cortex lit up during the drawing tasks as if he were actually seeing," says Pascual-Leone. ''His scan, to the untrained eye, might look like the brain of a sighted person."
Armagan presented a unique learning opportunity for the scientists at Beth Israel Deaconess. Pascual-Leone and his colleagues had access to a blind person able to render -- pictorially -- what his mind's eye had captured. But more importantly, they now had the technology to look at his brain while he rendered it, and to glimpse how his visual cortex functioned after 52 years without vision.
For centuries, scientists held that the brain was a fixed entity, that it was hard-wired for each individual function, and incapable of reorganizing after injury. In the late 1850s, the French neurosurgeon Paul Broca was the first to argue that language was associated with a specific part of the brain, and other investigators soon followed suit: The visual cortex at the back of the brain, they hypothesized, processed only vision, the somatosensory cortex in the mid-brain processed only pain, vibration, and touch, the auditory cortex on the sides of the brain existed solely to process sound.
In the last half-century, however, new technology and cutting-edge experiments like those of Pascual-Leone and his colleagues, have exploded that dogma, revealing not only that the brain does in fact reorganize and adapt, it does so all the time. ''What we saw in Esref," Pascual-Leone explains, ''was that he was using his visual cortex. It wasn't lying dormant. It hadn't shrunk or disappeared. Instead, it was recruited by other senses."
The brain, as work like Pascual-Leone's is revealing, is a lot more resourceful than we ever knew it was.
How a Blind Person's Brain Can "See"
Dr. Pascual-Leone has been studying the brain for three decades, examining its capacity to establish new neural connections, how to use the connections that exist, and how to harness them to create better rehabilitation strategies after trauma or sickness.
Pascual-Leone's patients and study subjects range from normal-functioning adults with special gifts like Armagan, to those with a range of neurological deficits, from sensory loss, to strokes, to chronic pain, to medically-resistant depression.
The blind, Pascual-Leone explains, provide an excellent opportunity to study brain plasticity. ''A large part of our brains is devoted to vision-some estimate more than half," he says. ''The question we are asking is what happens to that part of the brain when there is no input from the eyes?"
Over the past 10 years, Pascual-Leone and several other scientists, including his colleague Amir Amedi, have conducted experiments examining the brain's role in sensory perception, and much of their work has been with blind subjects. Using neural scans and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-a technique in which a noninvasive handheld device is used to stimulate or temporarily interfere with targeted brain functions-several studies have found activation in blind subjects' visual cortices, despite the fact they cannot see.
In an early study Pascual-Leone coauthored with Dr. Leonardo Cohen at the National Institutes of Health, results showed that during Braille-reading tasks, blind subjects' visual cortices lit up like lamps. But the mere fact that there was activity in that section, he pointed out, did not necessarily prove it was vital to that function. That, he said, is where TMS comes in.
''If you use TMS to temporarily interfere with the visual cortex during certain tactile tasks, like reading Braille, you'll find that early-blind subjects suddenly have trouble performing them," says Amedi, whose own independent studies have revealed similar results during language-based tasks. In the blind, unlike the sighted, the TMS interference, researchers believe, shows that the visual cortex is engaged-and in fact required-for certain nonvisual tasks.
So if, as scientists' findings suggest, the visual cortex need not be devoted solely to sight, how does the brain adapt after injury or new environmental influences? Does the brain forge new connections that did not exist before, or are the connections already there lying dormant, pressed into service by the circumstances?
Pascual-Leone's current work with his colleagues at Beth Israel Deaconess aims to answer those questions. For the past few years, they have been studying sighted subjects who volunteer to be blindfolded for five days and learn certain nonvisual tasks, including rudimentary Braille. In every case, before subjects donned the blindfold,functional MRI (fMRI) scans revealed little activity in their visual cortices during tactile tasks. After the subjects wore the blindfolds for two days, however, the scans showed bright patches of activity in the visual brain when the subjects used their fingers for tactile or Braille-reading tasks. By day five, the visual cortex glowed steadily during these same tasks. Yet two hours after the blindfolds were removed and the subjects' eyes had readjusted, scans of the visual area of their brains were as dark as they'd been on day one. Once the blindfolds were removed, touching, handling objects, and Braille-reading no longer activated ''sight" in the seeing.
The cortical adaptations that occur in the blindfold studies appear -- and disappear -- too quickly for any new nerve connections to grow, Pascual-Leone believes. He compares the adaptive pathways in the brain to detours after road blocks; building a new street takes a long time, he explains, but if there are other existing surrounding roads, they can be used right away. These immediate neurological detours reveal the brain's capacity to adapt in response to environmental factors, but it is sustained sight loss that will more likely result in lasting adaptations, he says.
Over time, if the brain continues to follow the detour routes, he believes, it starts to modify them to make them better, and might even make new structural connections. The fact that change occurred so immediately in the blindfolded subjects, he says, indicates that the visual cortex may inherently possess the machinery necessary to process nonvisual information.
Pascual-Leone and his colleagues believe that humans work with a reserve of existing connections dictated by their specific genetic make-up that, depending on their use, will become masked or unmasked by the individual's circumstances. ''What Esref and the blindfold studies show us," he says, is that lacking sight, the brain draws on information from the other senses. ''Even in the absence of vision," he says, ''the visual cortex is involved in creating images." In other words, the work of Pascual-Leone and others suggests that the brain has many additional capacities it can call on in a pinch.
The Birth of Brain Therapy
As both a physician and a researcher, Pascual-Leone aims to put his findings from his studies of the blind to use in developing rehabilitative therapies for other types of conditions. But his lab is not alone in its development of new treatments.
Other breakthrough therapies have arisen for strokes, autism, schizophrenia, spinal cord injuries, epilepsy, chronic pain, and many other previously ''untreatable" conditions. At the University of California, San Francisco, one neuroscientist has developed a computer program to teach language skills to dyslexic children through what is called, ''neural retraining." A professor in the department of psychology at the University of Alabama has used these developments to help stroke victims restore movement in their limbs. Two scientists at the University of Rochester have found that playing action video games can enhance a range of visual attention skills.
Yet despite the dozens of medical therapies that have been developed as a result of breakthroughs in thinking about brain plasticity, says Pascual-Leone, in both our scientific understanding of these mechanisms, and our ability to apply them clinically, we are still at the starting gate.
For researchers studying the brain, the next steps lie in learning enough about plasticity to harness it for individual needs. Through their work with the blind, Pascual-Leone and his colleagues hope to learn more about how visual images can be processed nonvisually in the brain-both for what it will tell them generally about how the brain works, and how, specifically, they might help the brain to work better for the newly blind or those who regain sight.
Subjects like Esref Armagan, says Pascual-Leone, help jump-start that process. ''We can never know what types of images were actually being created in Armagan's brain," he says. ''But we know now that when he draws those images, we can understand them visually without a doubt." This makes it seem as if he is seeing, says Pascual-Leone. ''And when we looked at his brain, we could see how."
Edited and Compiled by:
Ashutosh Pandey/ Anju.

Saturday, December 1, 2007

Advance Learning Programme Workshops in Haldwani

Education Mantra organised A Four Days Workshop on Advance Learning System inHaldwani at GGIC Haldwani. Ashutosh Pandey trained more than 1500 Students for fast learning and Remember techniques. He teaches the Students how they can Remember the Definitions, Facts, Formulas and Units in single effort. After successful Completion of Workshop more than 50 New Students Join the Coaching for Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry.

Friday, November 30, 2007

Sh. Zayed International Prize for the Environment

In 2007, a Memorandum of Understanding was signedbetween the United Nations Environment Programme:Regional Office for West Asia and the Sh. Zayed International Prize for the Environment in theUnited Arab Emirates. The Zayed Prize is the world’s most valuable environmental award,worth US$1 million. It was established by H.H.Sheikh Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the Vice President and Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates and Ruler of Dubai, in recognition of the philosophy, vision and achievements of former President, Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan, Mercy be upon him, who worked tirelessly top reserve and protect the environment for future generations of his country, the region and theworld.

Posted By
Anju /Ashutosh Pandey
India

Friday, November 16, 2007

EDUCATION Mantra is Organising Advance Learning Programme Workshops for CBSE and Uttrakhand Board Students. This is an Advance Programme for All Students of any Educational Pattern or Medium. Our learner Ashutosh Pandey will Provide the Learning Techniques to the Students. This is only 45 minutes Workshop without cost.

:SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE WORKSHOP:
  • Education Mantra Provide the Advance Techniques to Students to Understand the Fundamentals of the SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS and LANGUAGE.
  • Our Course modules are Designed on the Basis of UTTRAKHAND and CBSE Boards.
  • Coaching for Science+Mathematics+English Just in Rs. 300/- for IX and X Standards.
  • Coaching for Physics+Mathematics+English Just in Rs. 500/- for XI and XII Standards.
  • Full Syllabus in 90Days.
  • Twice Revision.
  • 10 test for all Subjects.
  • Final Pre Board Test 3 Times.
  • 24 hrs. Online Support for all Students Enroll for Coaching.
  • Enrollment fee Rs. 25/-.
  • 100% Class Room Support.
  • Audio Visual Support, Educational CD's for all Students free of Cost.
  • Free 30 days English Conversation Course Based on BBC Learning Series for all
  • Students Enroll for 3 Months Coaching Schedule.
  • Contact for Details and Enrollment:
    Ashutosh Pandey
    Nav Rang Vihar Pilikothi Haldwani.
    Uttrakhand India.
    Email:
    geetedu@gmail.com
    Call: 09837426072

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Know Your Global Human Right

Know Your Global Human Right

The Universal Declaration of human rights, ratified by the United Nations in 1948, forms the foundation of everyone’s most basic human rights, transcending all borders. Yet, despite its timeless relevance, surveys show that the vast majority of citizens have never heard of it.

These rights are your rights and everyone’s rights.
Use them. Insist on them.

Make universal human rights a fact- in worlds both small and large.
We Are All Born Free & Equal
We are all born free. We all have our own thoughts and ideas. We should all be treated in the same way.
Don’t Discriminate
These rights belong to everybody, whatever our differences.
The Right to Life
We all have the right to life, and to live in freedom and safety.
No Slavery
Nobody has any right to make us a slave. We cannot make anyone our slave.
No Torture
Nobody has any right to hurt us or to torture us.
You Have Rights No Matter Where You Go
I am a person just like you!
We’re All Equal Before the Law
The law is the same for everyone. It must treat us all fairly.
Your Human Rights Are Protected By Law
We can all ask for the law to help us when we are not treated fairly.
No Unfair Detainment
No body has the right to put us in prison without good reason and keep us there, or to
Send us away from our country.
The Right to Trial
If we are put on trial this should be in public. The people who try us should not let
Anyone tell them what to do.
We’re Always Innocent Till Proven Guilty
Nobody should be blamed for doing something until it is proven. When people say
We did a bad thing we have the right to show it is not true.
The Right to Privacy
Nobody should try to harm our good name. Nobody has the right to come into our
Home, open our letters, or bother us or our family without a good reason.
Freedom to Move
We all have the right to go where we want in our own country and to travel as we
Wish.
The Right to Seek a Safe place to Live
If we are frightened of being badly treated in our own country, we all have the right
to run away to another country to be safe.
Right to a Nationality
We all have the right to belong to the country.
Marriage and Family
Every grown-up has the right to marry and have the family if they want to. Men and women have the same rights when they are married, and when they are separated.
The Right to Your Own Things
Everyone has the right to own things or share them; nobody should take our things from us without a good reason.
Freedom of Thought
We all have the right to believe in what we want to believe, to have a religion, or to change it of we want.
Freedom of Expression
We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people.
The Right to Public Assembly
We all have the right to meet our friends and to work together in peace to defend our rights. Nobody can make us join a group if we don’t want to.
The Right to Democracy
We all have the right to take part in the government of our country. Every grown-up should be allowed to choose their own leaders.
Social Security
We all have the right to affordable housing, medicine, education, and child care, enough money to live on and medical help if we are ill or old.
Workers’ Right
Every grown-up has the right to do a job, to a fair wage for their work, and to join a trade union.
The Right to Play
We all have the right to rest from work and to relax.
Food and Shelter for All
We all have the right to a good life. Mothers and children, people who are old, unemployed or disabled, and all people have the right to be cared for.
The Right to Education
Education is a right. Primary school should be free. We should learn about the United Nations and how to get on with others. Parents can choose what we learn.
Copyright
Copyright is a special law that protects one’s own artistic creations and writings; others cannot make copies without permission. We all have the right to our own way of life and to enjoy the good things that art, science and learning bring.
A Fair and Free World
There must be proper order so we can all enjoy rights and freedoms in our own country and all over the world.
Responsibility
We have a duty to other people, and we should protect their rights and freedoms.
No One Can Take Away Your Human Rights

If you feel anyone is violate your Human Rights Then Mail us the Details.
Know More about Human Rights mail us.
Don’t Violate Anyone’s Human Right.
Join the Hands With Our Efforts.
If we protect Someone’s Right It will Empower Our Rights
.

Contact Us: geetedu@gmail.com
Call: +919837426072/+919759766561

Published by Education Mantra©
7/09/2007


Friday, June 8, 2007

Television Is A Boon: Debate

Geet Education Academy Organised a Group Discussion among their Students. There were two groups Favour and in Oppose. All aspirants participates in full boom. But Group Lead By Gaurav Yadav won. second group in favour leads by Miss Priyanka. The best aspirants declared Miss Shila the youngest participator. The Group Discussion is Co-ordinated By Mr. Raghav Bansal. Final result declared by Dr. ASHUTOSH PANDEY.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Child Labour India

Poor children in India begin working at a very young and tender age. Many children have to work to help their families and some families expect their children to continue the family business at a young age.India has all along followed a proactive policy in the matter of tackling the problem of child labour. India has always stood for constitutional, statutory and developmental measures that are required to eliminate child labour in India. Indian Constitution consciously incorporated relevant provisions in the Constitution to secure compulsory universal elementary education as well as labour protection for children.
Though most children begin working at a young age due to economic reasons, doing so allows them to break from some social constraints.

Indian Government policies on Child Labour in India

India's policy on child labour has evolved over the years against this backdrop. The present regime of laws relating to Child Labor in India have a pragmatic foundation and are consistent with the International Labour Conference resolution of 1979. The policy of the government is to ban employment of children below the age of fourteen years in factories, mines and hazardous employment and to regulate the working conditions of children in other employment. The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 seeks to achieve this basic objective.

Child Labour Laws in India
Through a notification dated May 26, 1993, the working conditions of children have been regulated in all employment which are not prohibited under the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act. Following up on a preliminary notification issued on October 5, 1993, the government has also prohibited employment of children in occupation processes like abattoirs /slaughter houses, printing, cashewnut descaling and processing, and soldering.
Children perform a variety of jobs: some work in factories, making products such as carpets and matches; others work on plantations, or in the home.

For boys the type of work is very different because they often work long hours doing hard physical labor outside of the home for very small wages. The government has made efforts to prohibit child labor by enacting Child Labour laws in India including the 1986 Child Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act that stated that children under fourteen years of age could not be employed in hazardous occupations.

This act also attempted to regulate working conditions in the jobs that it permitted, and put greater emphasis on health and safety standards. However, due to cultural and economic factors, these goals remain difficult to meet. For instance, the act does nothing to protect children who perform domestic or unreported labor, which is very common in India. In almost all Indian industries girls are unrecognized laborers because they are seen as helpers and not workers. Therefore, girls are therefore not protected by the law. Children are often exploited and deprived of their rights in India, and until further measures are taken, many Indian children will continue to live in poverty.
Compiled By: Ashutosh Pandey & Pooja

Saturday, April 7, 2007

Superconductivity

What is superconductivity? How was it discovered? What are the properties of superconductors, how are they applied now, and how are they likely to become widely used in the near future? These are just some of the questions...for answer these question pl mail to geet international team. our E mail ID: geetedu@gmail.com

Euthanasia दया मृत्यु

दया मृत्यु यानि Euthanasia एक ऐसी मौत है जो इन्सान खुद के लिए मांगता है। दुनिया के कई देशों में इसे बकायदा कानूनी मान्यता प्रदान है। जब इन्सान अपने जीवन से परेशान हो जाता है तो वह अपने लिए मौत कि मांग कर सकता है। लेकिन इसकी आड़ में आत्महत्या को स्वीकार नहीं किया जा सकता है। डाक्टर खुद अपनी मर्जी से किसी के लिए मौत का इंतजाम नहीं कर सकता है। दया मृत्यु में मरीज की इच्छा के चलते ही उसे मौत दीं जा सकती है। इस बारे में हम अपके विचार आमंत्रित करतें हैं। अपने विचार हमें E-mail geetedu@gmail.com पर भेंजे। सर्वश्रेष्ठ विचार को प्रकाशित किया जाएगा और मुफ़्त कोचिंग दीं जायेगी।

Is euthanasia ethical?

THIS QUESTION was the topic for regional competition of the fourth inter-institutional L. N. Birla National debate recently held at Chennai. Students from city colleges and schools, who participated in the debate, discussed this complex issue with ease and clarity. Some of the views expressed therein deserve closer scrutiny. While a few participants argued that freedom to die should be made a fundamental right, others opposed it on ethical grounds.
Legal dilemmas
Euthanasia (eu = good, thanatos = death) drew attention of Indian doctors and sociologists in April 2002, when the Dutch Parliament legalised it (actually in practice there for two decades) making the Netherlands the only country in the world to do so. Earlier, Oregon became the only State in the U.S. to pass the "Death with Dignity Act" in 1997 enabling patients to administer lethal injections themselves. Here the patient (instead of doctor) practises euthanasia with legal sanction.
Euthanasia is of three types: active (sticking a lethal injection), passive (withdrawing of life support systems) and death by double effect (through heavy doses of pain killers hastening the end). Any one of the above is in vogue in many countries.
The Hindu editorially observes (April 21, 2002): "Surveys in European countries indicate that many thousands of people are routinely assisted to die by doctors in one of the two latter ways every year."
In certain cases, there is the seal of approval too. For instance, recently a U.K. family court granted the right to die to a 43-year old woman, paralysed from the neck downwards, who wanted to have her ventilator switched off.
This is yet another case of granting legal sanction to passive euthanasia, a judicial exemption to the law of land. Similarly, in Columbia doctors are not held responsible if they followed terminally ill patient's request for mercy killing. Among the proponents of euthanasia, Dr. Jack Kevorkian (known as Dr. Death) who claimed that he had helped more than 130 people die since 1990 is unique. In an extreme case, he not only administered the lethal injection to Thomas Youk suffering from a wasting disease, but also made a "60 minute TV programme" of the process. Terming this as audacious, Judge Jessica Cooper awarded `Dr. Death' 10-25 year prison sentence for murder in April 1999 under the law of State of Michigan. Although Dr. Kevorkian styles himself as a crusader comparable to Dr. Martin Luther King, he had little support from his compeers. The American Medical Association blamed him for perverting physician-patient relationship, which weakened public trust in medical profession.People are naturally apprehensive that the ongoing happenings elsewhere will have a ripple effect in India too.
Two cases of Indian courts turning down requests of the patients to die were reported in the year 2001. The Patna High Court dismissed Tarakeshwar Chandravanshi's plea seeking mercy killing for his 25-year-old wife Kanchan, who had been comatose for 16 months. Again the Kerala High Court said no to the plea of BK Pillai, who had a disabling illness, to die. In spite of clear legal mandates, passive euthanasia, although sporadic, is prevalent in India. Here is an illustrative report from India Today (April 15, 2002):
"One case was of 59 year-old Neena Bonarji, an international bridge player who was suffering from progressive lung disease for three years and was being treated at Delhi's Ganga Ram hospital, had instructed her daughter Nisha Bhambani to put her off the ventilator when the time came. `When my mother slipped to 100 per cent supplementary support, we did what she had wished for,' says Bhambani. Within an hour, Bonarji passed away."
Although mercy killing appears morally justifiable (especially in brain dead patients whose organs can be donated to save other lives) in case of incurable diseases, doctors should be doubly careful, since they run the risk of attracting punishment for murder under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Dr. P.K. Dave, former director of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, emphasised: "even if the relatives insist, we never opt for it."
Safeguards
Euthanasia is a twin-aged weapon. While most patients who opt for mercy killing may be terminally ill with absolutely no chances of recovery, there are chances of misuse like wrong diagnosis, hallucinations of patients and collusion of patient's relatives and doctors. To tackle this problem pragmatically, all such cases should be reviewed by a panel of experts including physicians, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists and lawyers et al. In any case, judicial approval should be taken in all cases.


P.V.L.N. RAO
Courtesy THE HINDU for original story log on

http://www.hindu.com/op/2003/11/25/stories/2003112500341600.htm